Space - the Last Frontier!

DRAFT!!

During the Cold War, Space was clearly a defensive investment. Whoever controlled space, could militarily control the world.  Today, space of that nature is limited to satellites. 

So, why do we spend $20 bb every year for space exploration? Do we really think were going to mine gold in mars, and ship it back? And, of what economic value would that really be?

The truth is we are in space to find life.... alien life that would have evolved, because without which, Humanists will fail in their efforts to usurp America's Foundation. 

Evolution, today, while a valid science, has been pursued solely as a religious fundamentalism, for the purpose of forcing a new religion on Christian Americans, and all others who do not make up the 3% of radical Humanists.

While evolution is a valid science, it has been usurped by Anti-Americans for these purposes as clearly delineated in my commentary.

But, the next question is where does evolution stand today in purely scientific terms?

Today, evolution is failed, and disproved, scientifically.

Please read those words carefully and cautiously, because this does not mean the same thing that some die-hard Creationists will want to read it. But, it does mean what it says.

Today, every major step of evolution remains not only unproved, but disproved.

The universe is specifically 13.74 billion years old, for example, and thus, is young (relatively), and had a beginning. According to the immutable laws of thermodynamics, then if the world had a beginning, science mandates it had a Beginner. Period.

Hypotheses of the origins of life (spontaneous generation) are all completely disproved.  So disproved, that it will take a scientific miracle to resuscitate any one of them (premordial soup; lipid membranes, pre-RNA, RNA generation, underwater volcanic vents, sulphuric pregeneration, etc etc etc etc .

All interesting, all with some merit, and every single one proven to be IMPOSSIBLE.

Further, as the most prolific evolutionary biologists (Jay Stephen Gould and Ernst Mayr) have proven repeatedly, there remain no transitional forms in the fossil record. Otherwise, why would Gould so desperately offered his IMPOSSIBLE hypothesis of Punctuated Equilibrium? (it never made it to theory status....)

Today, after 6,000 recorded years of exceptionally intensive breeding, we have chihuahuas, golden retrievers and great danes and more.  Each extra-ordinarily different, each with severe mutation driven limitations and each very much a dog.... not a cat, bird or fish.   

Now, a kicker to throw back of humanists, Philosophy of Science... the dictums that drive how we view methods as being scientific, or not, clearly demand that atheism be excluded from any scientific conclusion. Just the opposite of what you are lead to believe as rabid humanists drool and sputter in our courts anytime any citizen attempt to require schools to teach science, rather than their religion.

That is right! Atheism is the only religious dogma that is discarded, carte blanche from science. The reasons are obvious, but I will let the discussions on that topic take their own life for now.

Science can accept Buddhism, Islam, Taoism, etc ... even lowly Christianity!

But, science can never evoke atheism. It is a fundamental tenet of the Philosophies of Science.
                                   
Finally, it does have to be fairly stated, while evolution is failed and disproved, today. WE do not know what genius tomorrow will bring. What new insights we will gain, or new data or knowledge that will come to fore to alter our current conclusions.

But, even if the currently impossible were to become possible, the final nail in the American Humanist coffin, is that even if evolution is proven, who can then say, God did not choose that system and methodology to create life and mankind?

This is why we spend $20 billion each year to explore space... .utter desperation of a failed religion and a failed coupe de tate.

I say stop all space exploration, SETI and these other wastes of public funds, and return those dollars to real science labs, which will look at real problems that will offer real solutions for mankind’s difficult world.